中美英绿色建筑运维评价体系的对比研究Comparative Research on Evaluation Systems of Green Building Operation in China,U.S.,U.K.
陈珂;胡睿博;胡广东;池彬;
CHEN Ke;HU Ruibo;HU Guangdong;CHI Bin;School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic Engineering,Huazhong University of Science and Technology;Faculty of the Built Environment,The University of New South Wales;
摘要(Abstract):
建筑运维是影响建筑全生命周期绿色表现的关键阶段。首先分析中国、美国、英国绿色建筑运维评价体系的目标对象和影响力,然后建立相对重要性指数(RSI)和相对客观性指数(ROI),从位置和交通(LT)、可持续场地(SS)、用水效率(WE)、能源和大气(EA)、材料和资源(MR)、室内环境质量(EQ)方面,定量分析评价体系的内容差异。结果表明,我国GB/T 50378—2019《绿色建筑评价标准》彰显“以人为本”的核心理念,强调舒适性和健康性,但在客观性和影响力等方面仍有待提升,为完善我国绿色建筑运维评价体系提供基础数据支持。
The building operation is a crucial stage that affects the green performance of the building lifecycle. This study analyzes the target objects and influence of the evaluation systems of green building operation in China and U.S., U.K., and establishes the relative significance index(RSI) and relative objectivity index(ROI) to analyze their contents from the aspects of location and transportation(LT), sustainable site(SS), water efficiency(WE), energy and atmosphere(EA), materials and resources(MR), and indoor environmental quality(EQ). The results showed that China's evaluation system highlights the idea of “people-oriented”, emphasizing comfort and health, but its objectivity and influence still need to be improved. This paper provides the basis for the improvement of evaluation system of green building operation in China.
关键词(KeyWords):
绿色建筑;运维;评价体系;相对重要性指数;相对客观性指数
green building;operation;evaluation system;relative significance index;relative objectivity index
基金项目(Foundation): 中国工程院重大咨询研究项目(ZD-2020-9)
作者(Authors):
陈珂;胡睿博;胡广东;池彬;
CHEN Ke;HU Ruibo;HU Guangdong;CHI Bin;School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic Engineering,Huazhong University of Science and Technology;Faculty of the Built Environment,The University of New South Wales;
参考文献(References):
- [1] 杨元华,赵辉,杨修明.绿色建筑技术创新的现状与建议[J].建筑经济,2019,40(8):94-96.
- [2] 赵玉红,闫文哲,穆恩怡.绿色建筑运营管理的现状及对策分析[J].建筑节能,2017,45(11):123-127.
- [3] NOROUZIA N,SOORI M.Energy,environment,water,and land-use nexus based evaluation of the global green building standards[J].Water-energy nexus,2020(3):209-224.
- [4] WU Z Z,SHEN L Y,YU A TW,et al.A comparative analysis of waste management requirements between five green building rating systems for new residential buildings[J].Journal of cleaner production,2016,112:895-902.
- [5] 杨一凡.中美绿色建筑评价体系对比分析[J].建材与装饰,2019(36):86-87.
- [6] WU Z Z,LI H,FENG Y,et al.Developing a green building evaluation standard for interior decoration:a case study of China[J].Building and environment,2019,152:50-58.
- [7] USGBC.Why LEED[DB/OL].https://www.usgbc.org/leed/why-leed.
- [8] BREEAM.The digest of BREEAM assessment statistics[DB/OL].https://www.breeam.com/resources/statistics-and-data/the-digest-of-breeam-assessment-statistics.
- 绿色建筑
- 运维
- 评价体系
- 相对重要性指数
- 相对客观性指数
green building - operation
- evaluation system
- relative significance index
- relative objectivity index
- 陈珂
- 胡睿博
- 胡广东
- 池彬
CHEN Ke- HU Ruibo
- HU Guangdong
- CHI Bin
- School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic Engineering
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology
- Faculty of the Built Environment
- The University of New South Wales
- 陈珂
- 胡睿博
- 胡广东
- 池彬
CHEN Ke- HU Ruibo
- HU Guangdong
- CHI Bin
- School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic Engineering
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology
- Faculty of the Built Environment
- The University of New South Wales